Skip to content
  • People
    • Howard Kaplan
    • Sarah Grady
    • Jed Glickstein
    • David Schmutzer
    • David Sinkman
    • Nabihah Maqbool
    • John D. Tinder
    • Ashley Cha
    • Sarah Brodwolf
    • Melissa Peña
  • Practice Areas
    • Overview
    • Civil Rights
      • Wrongful Death
      • Medical & Mental Health
      • Sexual Assault
      • Failure to Protect
    • Business Litigation
      • Complex Commercial Litigation
      • Employment Litigation
  • Dispute Resolution
  • Resources
    • Case Developments
    • Seventh Circuit Roundup
    • Prisoner’s Rights Listserv
    • Prisoners’ Rights Resources
    • Press Kit
  • Careers
Contact Us
312-852-2184
Call Today
  • People
    • Howard Kaplan
    • Sarah Grady
    • Jed Glickstein
    • David Schmutzer
    • David Sinkman
    • Nabihah Maqbool
    • John D. Tinder
    • Ashley Cha
    • Sarah Brodwolf
    • Melissa Peña
  • Practice Areas
    • Overview
    • Civil Rights
      • Wrongful Death
      • Medical & Mental Health
      • Sexual Assault
      • Failure to Protect
    • Business Litigation
      • Complex Commercial Litigation
      • Employment Litigation
  • Dispute Resolution
  • Resources
    • Case Developments
    • Seventh Circuit Roundup
    • Prisoner’s Rights Listserv
    • Prisoners’ Rights Resources
    • Press Kit
  • Careers
July 5, 2023
Case Number : 3:20-cv-00900-DWD

Siding with Plaintiff, Court Rejects Wexford’s Invocation of State Law Privileges and Its Use of “Relevance Redactions”

In a recent ruling, a district court in the Southern District of Illinois held that Wexford may not withhold documents assessing the quality of its care under a state privilege law, finding that the policy underlying the state privilege law did not outweigh the federal interests in the case, which raises questions about violations of the Constitution. The court also ordered Wexford to produce documents without redactions and in native format, finding that the redactions were “unnecessary and disruptive to an orderly resolution of the case.” The order comes in a case concerning the death of Kevin Curtis, a young man who was incarcerated at Menard Correctional Center, where the plaintiff (Yolanda Jackson, Mr. Curtis’s mother) has alleged that Defendants violated Mr. Curtis’s rights under the Eighth Amendment when they failed to provide adequate medical treatment, leading to his death.


157.00-2023-07-05 Order re Suppl. Pltf’s Motion to CompelDownload

Contact: 312-852-2184

media.relations@kaplangrady.com

PrevPrevious

Press Releases

Kaplan & Grady Welcomes John D. Tinder, Former Seventh Circuit Judge, District Court Judge, and United States Attorney, to the Firm

February 8, 2023
join our prisoners' rights Listserv
2071 N Southport Ave, Suite 205 Chicago, IL, 60614
  • 1-312-852-2184
  • hello@kaplangrady.com

Terms • Privacy • Accessibility

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome • This website contains attorney advertising

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome

This website contains attorney advertising

Terms • Privacy • Accessibility

© Kaplan & Grady LLC 2023

Please contact us with information about your case

Your submission will be reviewed and a notification will be emailed.