Skip to content
  • Team
  • Practice Areas
    • Civil Rights
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Alternative Dispute Resolution
    • Access to Medications for Opioid Use Disorder
  • Resources
    • General Resources
    • Case Developments
    • Seventh Circuit Roundup
    • Prisoners’ Rights Listserv
    • Opioid Use Disorder
  • Careers
  • Team
  • Practice Areas
    • Civil Rights
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Alternative Dispute Resolution
    • Access to Medications for Opioid Use Disorder
  • Resources
    • General Resources
    • Case Developments
    • Seventh Circuit Roundup
    • Prisoners’ Rights Listserv
    • Opioid Use Disorder
  • Careers
Contact Us
312-852-2184
Call Today
  • Team
  • Practice Areas
    • Civil Rights
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Alternative Dispute Resolution
    • Access to Medications for Opioid Use Disorder
  • Resources
    • General Resources
    • Case Developments
    • Seventh Circuit Roundup
    • Prisoners’ Rights Listserv
    • Opioid Use Disorder
  • Careers
  • Team
  • Practice Areas
    • Civil Rights
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Alternative Dispute Resolution
    • Access to Medications for Opioid Use Disorder
  • Resources
    • General Resources
    • Case Developments
    • Seventh Circuit Roundup
    • Prisoners’ Rights Listserv
    • Opioid Use Disorder
  • Careers
July 5, 2023
Case Number : 3:20-cv-00900-DWD

Siding with Plaintiff, Court Rejects Wexford’s Invocation of State Law Privileges and Its Use of “Relevance Redactions”

In a recent ruling, a district court in the Southern District of Illinois held that Wexford may not withhold documents assessing the quality of its care under a state privilege law, finding that the policy underlying the state privilege law did not outweigh the federal interests in the case, which raises questions about violations of the Constitution. The court also ordered Wexford to produce documents without redactions and in native format, finding that the redactions were “unnecessary and disruptive to an orderly resolution of the case.” The order comes in a case concerning the death of Kevin Curtis, a young man who was incarcerated at Menard Correctional Center, where the plaintiff (Yolanda Jackson, Mr. Curtis’s mother) has alleged that Defendants violated Mr. Curtis’s rights under the Eighth Amendment when they failed to provide adequate medical treatment, leading to his death.


157.00-2023-07-05 Order re Suppl. Pltf’s Motion to CompelDownload

Contact: 312-852-2184

media.relations@kaplangrady.com

PrevPrevious
NextNext

Press Releases

Plaintiff wins $4.35 million verdict for Defendants’ failure to protect her from sexual assault.

February 19, 2024

Federal civil rights lawsuit filed against New Orleans for 28-year-long wrongful incarceration

October 16, 2023
join our prisoners' rights Listserv
2071 N Southport Ave, Suite 205 Chicago, IL, 60614
  • 1-312-852-2184
  • hello@kaplangrady.com

Terms • Privacy • Accessibility

Terms/Privacy • Accessibility

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome

This website contains attorney advertising

© Kaplan & Grady LLC 2026

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome • This website contains attorney advertising

Please contact us with information about your case

By submitting this form you agree to receive SMS from Kaplan & Grady. Carrier and Data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. Reply STOP at any time to end messaging or Reply Help for more information.

By submitting this form you agree to receive SMS from Kaplan & Grady. Carrier and Data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. Reply STOP at any time to end messaging or Reply Help for more information.

Your submission will be reviewed and a notification will be emailed.